|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- The built environment is the physical counterpart of social relations.
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Norms of behavior
- Social responsibility
- Commitment
- Mutual concern
- Identity
- Involvement
- Participation
- Social pressure
- Community control
|
|
5
|
- “When people started protecting themselves as individuals rather than as
a community, the battle was lost”.
- Feeling of security as a precondition for creating and maintaining
social capital
- Some physical environments engender feelings of anonymity, isolation,
irresponsibility, lack of identity, powerlessness
|
|
6
|
- Approaches:
- Newman - Defensible Space
- Gardiner - Environmental Security Planning and Design
- Appleyard - Livable Streets
- Lynch - Image of the City
- Eliade - The Sacred and Profane
|
|
7
|
- “Territory” as the broadest physical expression of community
- Division of environment into zones toward which residents adopt
proprietary attitudes
- Define norms of behavior appropriate for different parts of the
territory
- Ability to observe and identify strangers, neighbors and others who
belong within different parts of the territory
|
|
8
|
- To observe and be observed
- Communicate community norms of behavior
- Willingness to confront behavior that violates norms within parts of
the territory, taking action, and being effective in the action taken
- Identification with either the victim or the property being vandalized
or stolen.
|
|
9
|
- Subtlely and progressively more private zones
- Private
- Semi-private
- Semi-public
- Public
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Area behind small houses and houses converted to retail businesses
- Open parking
- Unrestricted paths through centers of blocks past houses and stores
|
|
16
|
- Territorial definition coupled with building design improvements to
increate capacity of residents to survey their defined realm
- Lack of surveillance either into or out from these apartments
|
|
17
|
- Design features and neighborhood conditions can identify people as
potential victims
- Living and neighborhood environments can have debilitating effect on
human spirit
|
|
18
|
- Many elements of visual blight are in violation of laws dealing with
housing, weeds and litter, solid waste, graffiti, and abandoned vehicles
- The dumpster shown violates the law
|
|
19
|
- In contrast, public display of individuality, concern, and maintenance
makes neighborhood less vulnerable to crime and disorder
|
|
20
|
- Area can be near commercial and institutional uses that increase safety
and reduce fear of crime
- But the opposite also is true
|
|
21
|
- Defensible Space from broader community perspective
- Seen through data analysis on levels of:
- District (several square miles)
- Facility service areas, e.g. shopping center, park, hospital
- Neighborhood
- Street
- Building and site
|
|
22
|
- Considers the growth of an urban area and its impacts on the
neighborhood
- At first, businesses and facilities are small in scale and impacts are
limited in area
- As city expands, territorial conflicts increase
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Community centers, schools, multi-service centers, parks being built at
ever larger scales
- Alamosa multi-service center fenced from Alamosa neighborhood
|
|
27
|
- Defensible Space understood through analysis of data on:
- Residence of crime victim
- Residence of crime perpetrator
- Analysis of the location of the crime
|
|
28
|
- Clearly defined division between semi-public and semi-private space.
- Existing environment modified
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Juxtaposition of home interiors with outside use areas
- Reduce ambiguity of public & private space
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Doors w/ window every 50’ – 100’
- Store windows 100% transparent
- Street level facades – 75% glass
- Architectural detailing around doors and windows create interest
- Rhythm of display and door windows
- Transom windows
- Store signage within original frieze
- Canvas or metal awnings
- Illuminating the storefront and the sidewalk from under awning
- Interior lighting and no blockages of views within stores
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
- High Volume Streets (15,750+ vehicles/day)
- Very little social interaction.
Elderly felt lonely
- Residents: elderly, renters, few children
- Half average length of stay as on light traffic street
- Excessive speeds
- Considered dangerous, highest accident rates
- Noise, vibration, fumes, soot, litter
- Little peace and seclusion.
- Little personal identification with community
- Perceived as boring and monotonous
|
|
41
|
- Low Volume Streets (2,000- vehicles/day)
- 3x local friends, 2x acquaintances, heaviest use by children and teens,
street considered part of community
- Home owners, families with children, twice as long length of residence
- Considered safe
- Few perceived problems with noise, vibration, dirt
- Residents cleaned streets. More
landscaping
- Community life moved between homes and street
- Attention to detail in homes, porches, yards
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- 7’ parking lane
- 11’ traffic lane
|
|
45
|
- 7’ parking lane – 2 sides
- One 11’ traffic lane
- 26’ curb to curb width
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
- 8’ parking lane – 2 sides
- 10’ traffic lane – 2 lanes
- 36’ curb to curb width
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
- 15-25 speed – Moving slowly and safely
- Encourage people to pause, exchange, and communicate
- Median optional
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
- Transitional access to neighborhood streets – “connector”
- Includes bike lanes
|
|
52
|
- Proves regional access - “arterial”
- Bike lanes
- Median
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|