|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- 7 Basic Ideas
- Local government should play a proactive role
- Whether in new or older areas, not just development, but build community
|
|
3
|
- 7 Basic Ideas
- The existing community – neighborhoods, schools and businesses – comes
first in vitality and development
- Maintain, rehabilitate &
- improve infrastructure in existing neighborhoods
|
|
4
|
- Grow efficiently – develop first where infrastructure exists
- Don’t just plan – implement
- Keep us involved
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Grow through developing vacant land in the built up parts of the city
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- “In your neighborhood have you noticed in the last year a decline in
the appearance of properties, or that owner-occupied homes are turning
into rentals?”
- 30% of Albuquerqeans said “yes”
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Middle Rio Grande Connections Report
- 50% decline in performance of road system over next 25 years
|
|
12
|
- Rehabilitation and deficiency needs
- $1.9 billion dollars for rehab.
- $750 million for deficiencies
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- No community building standards
- Lack of integration of neighborhood schools, parks, retail and service
businesses
|
|
15
|
- Preferred Alternative
- Zoning and Design Standards
- Revitalize Older Neighborhoods
- Capital improvement Program
- Impact Fees
- Concurrency
- Development Agreements
- Coordinated City, County, APS, Regional Planning
|
|
16
|
- What Are the Strategy’s Desired Development Zones and Preservation
Zones?
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Traditional Neighborhood Development Principles
- Build or reinforce neighborhoods of limited size with clear edges &
focused center
- 7,000 - 10,000 residents
- Neighborhood center fosters interaction
- Variety of homes, workplaces, civic buildings & shops in
neighborhood
- Use of school as community center
|
|
28
|
- Traditional Neighborhood Development Principles
- Most homes are within a 5-10 minute walk of center and school
- Tree-shaded, pedestrian & bicycle-friendly streets, non-vehicular
paths
- Natural environment integrated into neighborhood
- Buildings & improvements are
compatible & attractive - design standards
|
|
29
|
- Traditional Neighborhood Development
- Transit-Oriented Development
- Commercial Center
- Campus
- Infill Development Zone
- Conservation Subdivision
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
- In terms of vitality and development,
- PGS policies:
- Increase residential development in
- 1960 city limits
- Foster new mixed-use development along selected streets and centers
- Provide sufficient funding for aging infrastructure
- Create and fund system of incentives, regulatory relief & speedy
development approval for desirable development
|
|
41
|
- In terms of vitality and development,
- PGS policies:
- Carry out the growth strategy in all areas – old and new
- Community education, community policing, neighborhood economic
development, & human service helping networks improve life in older
neighborhoods
- Stabilize older neighborhoods so investing there makes good economic
sense
- Reinvigorate positive planning efforts
|
|
42
|
- Community Oriented Policing
- Informal Helping - Assets Based Community Development
- Neighborhood Economic Development
- Community Education
- Neighborhood Planning and Identity
|
|
43
|
- Link capital improvement plan (CIP) to projected levels of population
& employment
- CIP contains program for correcting deficiencies & for
rehabilitation
- Divide infrastructure into tiers – fully service, partially service,
unserved. Link tiers to
development impact fee charges.
|
|
44
|
- Capital facilities guided by Traditional Neighborhood Development
principles
- Parks
- Community Centers - Schools
- Libraries
- Police substations
- Street design and paths
- Integrated and policy driven capital planning
- CIP prioritizes resources to fund basic needs
|
|
45
|
- Impact Fees are:
- Charges to developers to build capital improvements needed to support
new growth
- Impact fees reflect market cost of service delivery, initially set at
full marginal costs
- Based on capital projects included in the CIP to support growth
|
|
46
|
- Impact Fees lowered to reflect efficiencies based on land use, e.g.
- jobs-housing balance,
- Traditional Neighborhood Development
- neighborhood commercial centers,
- affordable housing.
- Impact Fees partially or fully waived based on desired development, e.g.
along priority corridors, in redevelopment areas, for village commercial
centers
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
- Concurrency is a review of infrastructure, either built or in the
capital improvement program, to to see whether adequate capacity exists
- Linked to:
- Preferred Alternative
- CIP
- Impact Fees
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
- Important facilities are available for new residents and new employees
- Unreasonable deterioration of street service is avoided
- Schools have adequate facilities for new families
- Parks are developed in time with growth
- Transit and street capacities are merged
|
|
53
|
- Demand for facility and infrastructure capacity can be reduced to
reflect efficiencies based on land uses, e.g. jobs-housing balance,
neighborhood commercial centers, affordable housing.
- Concurrency requirement can be waived based on desired development, e.g.
along priority corridors, in redevelopment areas, for village commercial
centers.
- Infrastructure capacity can be allocated to specific desired projects,
e.g. employment centers near housing, village commercial centers
|
|
54
|
- Refine approach at neighborhood, area, corridor & center levels
- Implement design standards, incentives, regulatory relief, based on
plans
|