|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- No universally accepted definition.
Based on subjective views, the physical environment and social
relations.
- Elements include:
- Geographic boundaries
- Inherent personal and property rights
- Standards of behavior
- Mutual support
- Sense of place and personal identity
- Place to invest
- Sense of security
- Place to go to school
|
|
5
|
- People living in some common or shared way.
- Networks of informal relations among family, friends, acquaintances
- Formal and informal organizational affiliation
- Norms of behavior
- Trust
- Bonds of reciprocal obligation
- Attention to problems and success in achieving values
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Socially Learned Ways of Acting and Thinking. “Designs for Living”
- Language
- Networks
- Social organization
- Belief Systems (Values, Norms, Attitudes)
- e.g.
- Child rearing, formal and informal economy, treatment of seniors and
youth, political structure, status,
housing standards, physical environment & landscape, art,
religion
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Building neighborhoods at the fringe
- Subsidies for fringe development
- Quality of existing neighborhoods
- New Urbanist codes
- Vision based planning
- Service policies
|
|
11
|
- Long term goals & vision
- Community conditions
- Policies affecting future programs
- Broad strategies (“What” & “Who”)
- Short term objectives (“How Much” & “When”)
- Programs and projects
- Systems thinking
|
|
12
|
- History & Oral History
- Census
- Inventories
- Population forecasts
- Geographic Info Systems (GIS)
- Surveys
- HMDA / Small business lending
|
|
13
|
- Lynch’s Image of the City
- Culture and the built environment
- Sacred space
- New Urbanism
|
|
14
|
- Conditions indicators
- Neighborhood typology
- Achieving housing affordability
- Community Reinvestment Act
|
|
15
|
- Community Development Corporations
- Housing Financial Analysis
- Neighborhood Redevelopment Example: Sawmill Community Land Trust
|
|
16
|
- Role of small neighborhood businesses
- Overview of approaches
- Mobilizing local resources
- Social capital
- Micro-lending
- Entrepreneurship
- CRA
|
|
17
|
- Community Development Corporations
- Main Street retail
- Incubators
- Job training and job prep
- Funding sources
|
|
18
|
- Conditions indicators
- Crime & Fear of Crime
- Community Oriented Policing
- Drugs-Crime-Courts-Jail-Rehabilitation
|
|
19
|
- “Defensible Space”
- “Environment / Security” Planning & Design
- Streets
- Code Enforcement
|
|
20
|
- Conditions indicators
- Philosophy of community education
- Participation and learning
- Models, e.g. School, Family, Community Partnerships, Comer Schools
- Organizing and educational reform
|
|
21
|
- School based social services
- Physical design
- Traditional Neighborhood Development
- Infill development zones
- Community school design
|
|
22
|
- Conditions indicators
- Mobilizing local resources - “Building Communities From the Inside Out”
- Informal Helping Networks
- Locally run social services
- Cooperatives - Collaboratives
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Abhorrent conditions created by rapid urbanization
- Decades of studies prove ineffective.
Corruption and self interest halt reform
- Settlement House movement creates neighborhood planning techniques
- Political movement produces change
|
|
26
|
- Comprehensive approach to urban growth
- Template for neighborhood land uses
- Land Trust as social and economic reform
|
|
27
|
- Columbia Exposition (1893) - “victory of business, political, cultural
elites”
- Plans for Washington, Cleveland, San Francisco, Baltimore, New York
- Sponsored by Commercial Club - $1 million cost
- Groupings of monumental public buildings, Michigan Ave Grand Blvd,
radial boulevards, parks, public sculptures, slum clearance.
|
|
28
|
- Designed first Garden City - Letchworth
- Elaborated design component on fuedal model
- Boundaries; hierarchy of centers - town, neighborhood, cluster; street
design, mix of housing
|
|
29
|
- “In ideal city plan the whole municipality would be laid out in
neighborhoods.”
- Addresses impact of the car
- Homogeneity, avoid strangers, not applied to existing neighborhoods
|
|
30
|
- “Disciple” of Howard and Unwin
- Garden City of 25,000 with three school-centered neighborhoods
- “Super-blocks” & pedestrian/park pedestrian spine
|
|
31
|
- 1926 Euclid v Ambler Realty - Supreme Court allows land use
regulations. Standard City
Planning Enabling Act in 1927.
- FHA created in 1934.
- Insurance and mortgage redlining, highway construction, and federal
subsidies for new home buying.
- Housing Acts of 1937, 1945, 1949.
- Housing Act of 1954.
|
|
32
|
- Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 and Special Impact Program amendments
in 1965
- Model Cities Act of 1966.
- Vietnam War
- New Federalism (1970), Revenue Sharing (1972), CDBG (1974)
- Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (1975)
Community Reinvestment Act (1977)
- Reagan and Bush
- Clinton
|
|
33
|
- Firmly in design tradition of Howard, Unwin and Perry.
- Diversity, civic life, social interaction
- “Design decisions will permeate . . . the way residents live”
- Weak connection to Settlement House
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative’s strongest tools were:
- “the concept of the master plan and the action of aggressive community
organizing”
|
|
36
|
- The return of civic life is important in all neighborhoods not just in
older, low-income areas.
- All neighborhoods have human resources that can be used to improve local
conditions.
- All neighborhoods have economic market demand, e.g. for retail and
housing.
|
|
37
|
- Much good already is being accomplished in neighborhoods in an informal
and community-based way.
- Community development and education are equivalent to each other.
- Solutions to neighborhood problems are mutually reinforcing, e.g.
economic dev., housing, social services, jobs.
|
|
38
|
- The physical and social environments of neighborhoods are virtually the
same.
- Private economic conditions underpin the neighborhood’s social
environment.
- Programs to improve neighborhood conditions must address whole individuals,
families, and communities.
|
|
39
|
- Programs and services that engage, empower, and mobilize local residents
are more effective.
- Neighborhood residents need to have greater control over local programs
and services.
- Planners should incorporate the perspectives and approaches of community
organizers
|
|
40
|
- Problem solving, action, and power are mutually reinforcing for
neighborhood organizations.
- Concerns about safety and security affect the ability to learn and
contribute.
- Resources from government are available.
- Government help sometimes can be harmful.
|
|
41
|
- Government should encourage and strengthen Community Based
Organizations.
- Neighborhood can’t go it alone. Collaboration is critical.
|