|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Putting the Community
- Into
- Community Policing
|
|
3
|
- Incidence of crime, delinquency, and fear of crime are important in
process of neighborhood and urban change
- Impact on housing market
- . . . On small businesses
- Decline in property values
- Spiral of neighborhood decline
|
|
4
|
- Decline of the “horizontal” system of institutions in the neighborhood.
(see Warren, The Community in America)
- Traditional policing practices
- Crack cocaine, deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill, weakening of
the social safety net, rise of homelessness
- Neighborhood concentration of poverty
|
|
5
|
- Crime is caused by social disorganization
- Prevents community from realizing its values and maintaining social
controls
- OR
- Crime is caused by subcultural values and practices
- Either different status system or different means to achieve common
values
|
|
6
|
- Property of community within neighborhoods (not of individuals)
- Community as system of friendship and kinship networks, formal and
informal associations and local institutions, rooted in family life
- Formed through socialization process. Norms and trust
|
|
7
|
- Collective efficacy as shared belief in neighborhood’s capacity for
action and the achievement of community objectives
- Networks involving parents and teachers, religious and recreational
leaders, elected officials, business owners, social service program
managers, seniors, police, and court officials
|
|
8
|
- Outdated beliefs:
- Poverty, mobility, single-parent households, divorce rates, domestic
violence, heterogeneity, immigration
|
|
9
|
- Current understanding:
- Poverty, mobility, single-parent households, divorce rates, domestic
violence, heterogeneity, immigration
|
|
10
|
- Physical and social disorder
- Graffiti, broken windows and street lights, damaged sidewalks,
abandoned cars, guns, litter, vacant and dilapidated houses and small
businesses, site “hardening”
- Panhandling, drug dealing, gangs, prostitution, idle men, the homeless,
youth as “vectors of fear”
- Police and courts as sources of fear
|
|
11
|
- Fear of strangers
- Shattered confidence in community helpfulness
- Suspicion
- Feelings of vulnerability
- Anger
- Powerlessness
- Loss of control
- Site hardening
- Withdrawal from community life & neighbors
- Decline in organizational life
- Decline in organizing capacity
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Traditional Policing
- Problem Oriented Policing
- Community Policing
|
|
14
|
- Prioritization of serious crimes (e.g. murder, assault)
- Random officer patrols
- No beat assignments
- Off the streets and into patrol cars
- Rapid response to crime calls
- Call documentation and case building
- Increased number of specialized units
|
|
15
|
- Reactive arrests
- Dispatched to volatile situations - domestic disputes, robberies in
progress, hostage situations
- Break up unruly groups of adults and teenagers
- Paramilitary organization - “Thin Blue Line”
- A part of complex criminal justice system - including P.D., D.A.,
courts, probation, jail
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- A reaction to evidence of relative ineffectiveness of traditional
policing
- Scientific process to
- Analyze crime patterns
- Use GIS
- Create intervention plans (e.g. directed patrols, criminogenic
substances (guns, cash, etc.), convergence of victims and criminals)
- Testing plans in the field
|
|
20
|
- Not Community Oriented Policing
- Technical in nature
- Police identify problems, analyze them, define reaction, and implement
- Focus on positive impact on crime statistics
- Not necessarily a partnership with community
- Part of Community Policing model in Chicago
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- SARA, Problem solving method
- Scanning: Identification of problems and prioritization. Data & GIS. Community mtgs. Police create beat plan.
- Analysis: Beyond symptoms - to causes. Crime “Triangle”. Adding physical features to map:
businesses, vacant buildings, rentals, schools, parks, etc.
|
|
25
|
- SARA, Problem solving method
- Response:
- Create comprehensive strategies that aim at making long lasting impact
on problem. Two sides of the
Crime Triangle. “Outside the box” thinking.
- Implement the strategy through programs.
- Assessment: Keep track of activities.
Identify extent to which problems are resolved. Report back to community. Build a knowledge base.
|
|
26
|
- Police and community work together to identify, prioritize, and solve
problems including crime, drugs, fear, social and physical disorder, and
neighborhood decay
- COP is a philosophy and an organizational strategy, it is not a
separate program within the police department
|
|
27
|
- General approach:
- Problem solving approach in partnership with the community
- Based on mutual respect
- Residents have “rights and responsibilities”
- Community assume selected responsibilities for realizing public safety
- External control (police, courts, jail) can never substitute for
internal (community) control
|
|
28
|
- Organizational elements:
- Beat patrol officers (and random patrols)
- Long term assignments to beats
- Decentralization of control to patrol officers and sergeants
- Focus on problem solving rather than arrests or citations
- Reductions in specialized units, reassignments
- Beat meetings
- Store front offices
|
|
29
|
- Local police officer roles
- Continuous, sustained contact with community
- Direct community-based problem solving effort
- Organize resources of community to address problems
- Recruit, communicate, lead community residents
- Publicize efforts
- Help those with special needs including youth, elderly, poor,
minorities, and the homeless
- Coordinate the services of govt and service agencies
- Protect residents, homes, businesses, and facilities
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- Strengths
- Focus on social capital
- Problem solving
- Partnership with community
- Partnership with other government agencies
- Weaknesses
- Role conflict with traditional policing model
- Police attitude toward civilians
- Backgrounds / training of sworn officers
- Unrealistic role of community police officer
|
|
33
|
- Strengths
- Size and presence of police force
- Importance of crime and fear of crime
- Reduces the fear of crime
- If comprehensive, reduces crime
- Weaknesses
- Police officers determine beat plans
- Weak problem solving
- Generally low participation found at community meetings
- Weak collaboration with other government agencies
- Should police officer be at center of neighborhood redevelopment?
|
|
34
|
- Class Discussion:
- What does the role of an organizer tell us about Community Policing?
|